The recent riot in Los Angeles began with the arrest of undocumented immigrants near a school. There are currently an estimated 18.6 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S. The question remains: how can authorities enforce immigration laws fairly, especially for those who have waited years in the legal immigration queue? Former President Trump’s policy was not against immigration itself, but specifically against illegal immigration, arguing that lax enforcement undermines law and order and discourages lawful entry.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees all children the right to education, regardless of immigration status. Under the principles of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), certain locations—such as courts, churches, and schools—are designated as sensitive zones where immigration enforcement is restricted. However, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have reportedly waited outside schools to detain parents. While technically outside school grounds, this practice has been criticized as inconsistent with DEI values. Following one such incident, ICE offices were attacked. When officers called for help, police reportedly delayed their response for several hours. The situation escalated into riots, prompting the deployment of the National Guard.
In California, many undocumented immigrants have lived and worked for over two decades, with roots tracing back to the Obama administration. These individuals often take on low-wage, labor-intensive jobs such as agricultural work, meatpacking, and maintenance. Many are of Mexican origin and return home during festivals but reside in the U.S. for work due to significantly higher wages—even if reduced for their status. While America does need a labor force for such roles, it raises the question: how can it meet that need legally and sustainably?
One model worth studying is Hong Kong’s approach to domestic helpers during its time as a British colony in the 1970s. Workers from Southeast Asia were allowed to work under fixed-term contracts, renewable every two years. However, they were not granted permanent residency, and were excluded from minimum wage protections. This allowed Hong Kong to maintain a controlled supply of affordable legal labor. To combat illegal immigration and influxes of refugees, Hong Kong implemented strict identity checks. Everyone was required to carry ID at all times or face penalties. The system helped provide legal labor while maintaining public order.
In contrast, some critics argue that U.S. cities like San Francisco have struggled with issues like theft and lawlessness attributed in part to unchecked illegal immigration, contributing to urban decline.
While the principles of DEI are important, enforcement and control are also necessary. A balance must be struck. If unrest continues, it could destabilize financial markets, leading to broader economic consequences.